| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Alister Murray
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:22 pm Post subject: High meter readings due to leakage |
|
|
What is the practice of other water suppliers in dealing with high invoices resultant from on site leakage?
Strictly speaking all responsibility lies with the property owner but recently I have experienced cases where leakage was not apparent on the ground and as we read meters on a 3 monthly basis a high bill resulted. Do others strictly adhere to the practice of total responsibility with the property owner or do they discount the invoice - what rationale is used? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oscar
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 4 Location: Oamaru
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Alister
NZS9201.7:2007 (i.e. Model General Bylaws Part 7) give good guidance on this issue, provided this is your adopted document. Basically you can either estimate or charge as metered, and it might come down to things like precedent (set or setting), volume lost and your relationship(s) with your customers. _________________ Oscar Smit
Assets Engineer - Water and Wastewater
Waitaki District Council |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTRBOY
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Alister
You would need to check current policy and practice of the councils and CCOs in Auckland but most accept that an unlimited charge for all metered water (including the leak) is unworkable and inevitably ends up in tears in the Mayors office. Typically the account is discounted provided the property owner responds quickly and produces evidence that the repair has been done (followed by check reads). The discount might be based on paying normal consumption plus the production cost of the extra water, given that Auckland on bulk supply, but limited to twice the normal account. Need some rules around say only getting 2 rebates in 5 years to avoid ongoing issues. Above only applies to residential and maximum limitation does not apply to commercial properties which includes residential rentals. Auckland, Manukau and Rodney also charge wastewater on water consumed so will have some way of also dealing with that. Check their Customer Charters. Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dylan Stuijt
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 35 Location: Hastings, New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Alister
We tend to give the owner the opportunity to repair the leak as soon as its identified as quite often they don't realise they have a leak, and then estimate the volume for the previous period based on historical figures. However if they don't repair the leak in a timely manner we charge the full amount as allowed for under our By-law, and pursue water wasting provisions under the LGA. As Oscar pointed out, It does come down to your relationship with your customers.
In one case a worker informed us that a leak had been obvious for months in the work shed, but the owner never got around to repairing it. In this case we charged the full amount. _________________ Water Supply Manager - Hastings District Council |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wicca
Joined: 09 Aug 2008 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Greetings Alister,
From the Otorohanga DC perspective.
1. They are told of a high reading and it is estimated
2. They are told of the high reading and charged the full amount
3. They are told of the high reading and charged the full amount
4. They are told of the high reading, charged the full amount and charged by ODC to have the repair done.
We feel that three notifications (18 months) is more than enough and they pick up the costs. It has only gone to that level once that anyone can remember though, usually its done on the second warning when the full charge is made.
Cheers _________________ The earth is the insane asylum for the universe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|